danceviewwest The
DanceView Times, San Francisco Bay Area edition |
Stylish Remakes of Famous Scores Pascal
Rioult Dance Theatre
By Rita Felciano Last year Pascal Rioult Dance Theatre introduced itself to Bay Area audiences with a program of emotionally engaging and attractively styled choreography set to Ravel. This year the company is back with Rioult's take on some of Stravinsky's best-known scores: The Firebird, Duo Concertant and Pulcinella Suite. In Rioult's hands Duo became Black Diamond; Pulcinella, Veneziana. The evening closed with Rioult's crowd-pleasing but excellent interpretation of Ravel's bestseller, Bolero. Choreographing to scores which have already been set by many other choreographers and which are well loved by symphony-goers as well, takes a certain amount of gumption and a willingness to defy the odds. Rioult, whose selections of the Ravel pieces already showed a predilection for going with what is popularly accepted, must feel that his choreography can make us hear the music in ways which we might not have done before. Any other explanation would imply marketing over artistic considerations. But by taking on the tried and true, Rioult also runs the risk of confronting ears that know the music well and eyes that will inevitably set up comparisons. Still, art-making, if it is about nothing else, is about risk-taking. So it was disconcerting to see the superficiality of Rioult's take on both the Pulcinella and The Firebird scores. The suite of dances—duets, quartets, the odd trio—slide in and out of two-dimensional graphic images into which the dancers freeze, and a more fully fleshed out use of the body. The idea of moving between these two modes of representation is intriguing, but something needs to happen to them. Repetition alone is not enough. Dressed in short white skirts with red underwear, the girls are frolicking bundles of energy, the boys, in old-fashioned knee length athletic wear, generous and mischievous friends. But the emotional tone never varies, except for a central quartet in which shifting partnerings make an attempt at a softer, more nuanced exploration of relationships. For the most part these skipping, hopping, dropping and strutting encounters remain so unrelentingly buoyant that they freeze the smiles on the dancers' faces. Unremitting cheer becomes tiresome quite quickly—for bother dancers and audiences. For The Firebird—in the ten episode 1946 version—Rioult made up his own narrative of re-awakening and redemption. Apparently basing it in part on Navajo legend, here the life-giving feather (actually two) is carried by an attractive elementary-school age dancer. Hannah Burnette knows a thing or two about stage comportment; she carries off her thankless task with considerable aplomb. Firebird is dominated by a constructivist-inspired set of dark-hued geometric panels from which dancers' heads pop up or behind which their bodies slink a away. From centerstage hangs a triangular shape that looks as if it is about to fall down and pierce whoever happens to be underneath. The set may look like something out of a '20s Soviet-style theatrical experiments, the skin-tight latex-style black/gray costume, including neck braces, resonate with S/M inflections, or are leftovers from Sigourney Weaver's Alien wardrobe. Rioult portrays a downtrodden, mechanistic society—think Yakov Protazanov's silent Aelitha-Queen of Mar—which gradually finds or rediscovers its humanity. The awakening doesn't come by way of a growing social awareness as in the 1924 film but by recalling lost innocence or a belief in rebirth. It's a process that is started by Burnette's skipping between stooping, clinched-fist ape-like creatures who jerk, shuffle or scurry along. They crawl on all fours, rear up or collapse into primordial ooze. Burnette wafts the feathers that are taller than she is. She prods individuals; she climbs over their shoulders, she embraces their knees. Gradually you sense that these people are trying to break out of their encasements. They push against invisible membranes, shielding their eyes from the entering light. They awkwardly entangle each other, engage in a fierce collision to finally burst into great leaps into the air. Rioult's choreography is as much a portrayal of evolution as it is of salvation. Unfortunately, Rioult's means to embody this grand scheme of good overcoming evil, are just too simplistic. He rides the music instead of going inside it. The work is rhythmically monotonous, and if there were fresh movement ideas, they were difficult to discern. On a fundamental level, however, the proposition that innocence portrayed as simplistically as it was here, could overcome depravity, as monolithic as seen here, simply stretched credulity beyond the suspension of disbelief. Bolero brought this mixed show to a satisfying finale. Rioult wonderfully tapped into the mechanical exercise quality of this most famous of Ravel's scores. Dressing his dancers in metallic unitards, imparted a hint of a sci fi. For the ensemble Rioult devised tiny piston-like unisons for the torso and angular robotic gestures for the arms. The patterns started in place but gradually opened into stacked lines, a diagonal and finally a circle that opened and closed like a photographer's lens. Out of this uniformity, individual dancers broke into open bodied stretches, arabesques and spiral turns. They set up striking contrasts to the ensemble's inexorable progression which inevitably would suck up the soloists again. It is a measure of Rioult's skill and understanding of this on the surface so simple score that he introduced us to his "instruments" as imperceptibly as Ravel did. To have a score like this one still reveal secrets is no small accomplishment for any choreographer. Photos: Originally
published:
|
|
|
Copyright
©2003 by by DanceView |
|